The examples show:
- Building a Signed Pod with different types of values
- Building a MainPod
- Input SignedPod to MainPod
- Input MainPod to MainPod
- Using MainPod or MockMainPod
- Using custom predicates
* calculate MainPod id in a dynamic-friendly way
The MainPod id is now calculated with front padding and a fixed size
independent of max_public_statements so that introduction gadgets can be
verified by a MainPod while paying only for the number of statements
they use. This is because with front padding of none-statements we can
precompute the poseidon state corresponding to absorbing all the padding
statements and only pay constraints for the non-padding statements.
The id is calculated as follows:
`id = hash(serialize(reverse(statements || none-statements)))`
* add time feature and disable timing by default
* apply suggestions from @arnaucube
* link issues in todos
* Add RecursiveCircuit
The RecursiveCircuit verifies N proofs of itself (N=arity), together with
the logic defined at the InnerCircuit (in our case, used for the
MainPodCircuit logic).
The arity defines the maximum amount of proofs of itself that the
RecursiveCircuit verifies. When arity>1, using the RecursiveCircuit has the
shape of a tree of the same arity.
π_root
▲
┌───────┴────────┐
│RecursiveCircuit│
└─▲───▲───▲────▲─┘
┌───────┘ ┌┘ └┐ └──────┐
│π''_1 │ ... │ π''_N│
┌────────┴───────┐ ┌┴┐┌─┐┌┴┐ ┌───────┴────────┐
│RecursiveCircuit│ │.││.││.│ │RecursiveCircuit│
└──▲─────────▲───┘ └─┘└─┘└─┘ └──▲─────────▲───┘
│ │ │ │
π_1 ... π_N π'_1 ... π'_N
where
N: arity of the RecursiveCircuit
π_i: plonky2 proof of the RecursiveCircuit
* add different inner-circuits in the test, reusing the same verifier_data; polish recursion interfaces
* add InnerCircuit::Params
* rm non_base_node
* WIP refactor RecursiveCircuit
* wip. change approach on verifier_data of circuits used in recursivecircuit. arity=1 works
* recursion works fine without registering verifierdatas as publicinputs
* add hashing of verifier_data (out & in-circuit) methods with test
* connect previous and current verifier_datas hashes
* polish
* add InnerCircuit's public_inputs to the RecursiveCircuit
* extend recursive test
* polish & review suggestions
* unify fe/be NativeOp and NativePred
* remove Origin in favour of PodId
* Combine string and hash in Key
* use middleware::AnchoredKey in frontend
* merge frontend/middleware types
* refactor custom predicates
* clean up a bit
* fix middleware custom tests
* clean up
* clean up 2
* add acronyms in typos list
* Contains should take three arguments (root, key, value)
* Add a test for frontend Dictionaries
* Separate frontend and middleware operations
* Make tests pass: add arg to contains
* Cargo fmt
* Merkleproof verify circuit (#143)
* merkletree: add keypath circuit
* merkletree-circuit: implement proof of existence verification in-circuit
* parametrize max_depth at the tree circuit
* Constrain selectors in-circuit
* implement merketree nonexistence proof circuit, and add edgecase tests
* add non-existence proofs documentation in the mdbook, mv EMPTY->EMPTY_VALUE & NULL->EMPTY_HASH, dependency clean and public exposure methods
* review comments, some extra polishing and add a test that expects wrong proofs to fail
* Add circuit to check only merkleproofs-of-existence
With this, the merkletree_circuit module offers two different circuits:
- `MerkleProofCircuit`: allows to verify both proofs of existence and proofs
non-existence with the same circuit.
- `MerkleProofExistenceCircuit`: allows to verify proofs of existence only.
In this way, if only proofs of existence are needed,
`MerkleProofExistenceCircuit` should be used, which requires less amount
of constraints than `MerkleProofCircuit`.
* Code review
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmad <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* Towards Contains/NotContains in middleware and backend
* Fix build
* Adding error handling to deal with op compile introduce extra ops
* Incorporate Merkle proofs into MockMainPod
* Merkleproof verify circuit (#143)
* merkletree: add keypath circuit
* merkletree-circuit: implement proof of existence verification in-circuit
* parametrize max_depth at the tree circuit
* Constrain selectors in-circuit
* implement merketree nonexistence proof circuit, and add edgecase tests
* add non-existence proofs documentation in the mdbook, mv EMPTY->EMPTY_VALUE & NULL->EMPTY_HASH, dependency clean and public exposure methods
* review comments, some extra polishing and add a test that expects wrong proofs to fail
* Add circuit to check only merkleproofs-of-existence
With this, the merkletree_circuit module offers two different circuits:
- `MerkleProofCircuit`: allows to verify both proofs of existence and proofs
non-existence with the same circuit.
- `MerkleProofExistenceCircuit`: allows to verify proofs of existence only.
In this way, if only proofs of existence are needed,
`MerkleProofExistenceCircuit` should be used, which requires less amount
of constraints than `MerkleProofCircuit`.
* Code review
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmad <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* Towards Contains/NotContains in middleware and backend
* Frontend compound types -- allow one frontend operation to produce multiple middleware statements (in progress)
* Incorporate Merkle proofs into MockMainPod
* Incorporate Merkle proof op arg into frontend
* Compile one statement to many, in progress
* Fix remaining tests
* Minor clean-up
* Oops I did a bunch of work in the middle of a rebase, committing
* Incorporate Merkle proof op arg into frontend
* still working on frontend compound types, refactor compile() to output multiple statements
* Contains statements for frontend types: code compiles
* Tests pass
* Examples use front-end compound types
* Remove old Contains and NotContains from frontend
* Add nin to typos
* Code review
---------
Co-authored-by: arnaucube <git@arnaucube.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahmad <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* sync spec & code
* move primitives (merkletree) into the backend
* comment on the ops spec and link to issue #108
* typo
* fix github-ci mdbook-publish pages
* Custom statements on backend
* Add support for custom statements and deductions on backend
* typo checker smh
* clean up match statement
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Afuni <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* clean up more match statement
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Afuni <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* delete done todo
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Afuni <root@ahmadafuni.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Afuni <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* Print pods from SignedPodBuilder
* Add additional print to test printing SignedPodBuilder
* Mock-prove and print MainPod
* Implement ToFields for custom predicates and dependencies
* Test: print serialization of a recursive batch
* Rearrange serialization of CustomPredicate so args_len is always in the same position
* Serialize predicates with first entry nonzero to avoid collision with padding
* Off by one error in ethdos test BatchSelf(2)
* cargo fmt
* not a typo
* Typos, trying again
* Implement Containers (Dictionary,Set,Array) on top of MerkleTree. And restructure the code.
- Reorganize the code grouping backends, middleware, frontend, (crypto) primitives.
- Add types Dictionary,Set,Array at the middleware layer, so that
it can be used both by the backend and frontend. The Dictionary, Set,
Array use the merkletree differently as specified at
f2575d1524/book/src/values.md (dictionary-array-set)
- The containers introduce the trait Container, which has the
method 'cm()'. At the current version this uses a merkletree
under the hood, and the method 'cm' returns the merkle root.
- Ideally neither frontend nor backend use the MerkleTree type, and they
use the wrappers {Dictionary,Set,Array}. Note that the current commit
the MerkleTree is used at the mock-backend to check internal values, but
not at the struct types.
- updated the spec's merkletree section updating the defined interface
- add github ci to run the tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Afuni <root@ahmadafuni.com>
Co-authored-by: Eduard S. <eduardsanou@posteo.net>
Reasoning: till now we're only compiling it when the changes land at the
`main` branch, which allows invalid changes to the mdbook to pass the PR
check. With the update at this commit we ensure that the new PRs pass
the mdbook compilation check.
Extend merkletree spec, init SignedPod section, add typos checker in CI
- extend merkletree spec, converting old hand-drawn diagrams to drawio
diagrams, and adding new diagrams (related: #6)
- init SignedPod section (related: #2)
- initial draft of the types dictionary, set, array (related: #26)
- add typos checker in CI (and correct the ones that were detected)
Note on drawio diagrams: each image file contains the metadata to edit the diagram in the draw.io website.
