* implement merkletree insert & insert-proof-verification
* add merkletree circuit to verify insertion proof
wip
* fix merkletree's GraphViz generation for cases with empty siblings
* implement tree insert-verif circuit siblings checks
Note: I've implemented also an alternative version which instead of
inputting a witness value 'divergence_level' it inputs a bitmask. Both
approaches (divergence_level and divergence_bitmask) take the same
amount of constraints (336 constraints for a tree of 32 levels, and for
an hybrid approach it takes 331 constraints but the code gets a bit less
readable). So I've kept with the current implementation (using
divergence_level) which is more easy to follow.
* [tree] modify the strategy for the insert-proof (out-circuit)
* re-implement insert-proof verification circuit
* add pending checks and polish
* add tests for disabled(&enabled) cases that should fail
* update typos.toml config
* Add test with tampering
* add check 5.3, to prevent tampering (at insertion proof circuit)
* move old_leaf_hash computation outside the loop, simplify check 5.3 booleans
* apply @ed255 review suggestions
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmad <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* Add RecursiveCircuit
The RecursiveCircuit verifies N proofs of itself (N=arity), together with
the logic defined at the InnerCircuit (in our case, used for the
MainPodCircuit logic).
The arity defines the maximum amount of proofs of itself that the
RecursiveCircuit verifies. When arity>1, using the RecursiveCircuit has the
shape of a tree of the same arity.
π_root
▲
┌───────┴────────┐
│RecursiveCircuit│
└─▲───▲───▲────▲─┘
┌───────┘ ┌┘ └┐ └──────┐
│π''_1 │ ... │ π''_N│
┌────────┴───────┐ ┌┴┐┌─┐┌┴┐ ┌───────┴────────┐
│RecursiveCircuit│ │.││.││.│ │RecursiveCircuit│
└──▲─────────▲───┘ └─┘└─┘└─┘ └──▲─────────▲───┘
│ │ │ │
π_1 ... π_N π'_1 ... π'_N
where
N: arity of the RecursiveCircuit
π_i: plonky2 proof of the RecursiveCircuit
* add different inner-circuits in the test, reusing the same verifier_data; polish recursion interfaces
* add InnerCircuit::Params
* rm non_base_node
* WIP refactor RecursiveCircuit
* wip. change approach on verifier_data of circuits used in recursivecircuit. arity=1 works
* recursion works fine without registering verifierdatas as publicinputs
* add hashing of verifier_data (out & in-circuit) methods with test
* connect previous and current verifier_datas hashes
* polish
* add InnerCircuit's public_inputs to the RecursiveCircuit
* extend recursive test
* polish & review suggestions
* unify fe/be NativeOp and NativePred
* remove Origin in favour of PodId
* Combine string and hash in Key
* use middleware::AnchoredKey in frontend
* merge frontend/middleware types
* refactor custom predicates
* clean up a bit
* fix middleware custom tests
* clean up
* clean up 2
* add acronyms in typos list
* Contains should take three arguments (root, key, value)
* Add a test for frontend Dictionaries
* Separate frontend and middleware operations
* Make tests pass: add arg to contains
* Cargo fmt
* Merkleproof verify circuit (#143)
* merkletree: add keypath circuit
* merkletree-circuit: implement proof of existence verification in-circuit
* parametrize max_depth at the tree circuit
* Constrain selectors in-circuit
* implement merketree nonexistence proof circuit, and add edgecase tests
* add non-existence proofs documentation in the mdbook, mv EMPTY->EMPTY_VALUE & NULL->EMPTY_HASH, dependency clean and public exposure methods
* review comments, some extra polishing and add a test that expects wrong proofs to fail
* Add circuit to check only merkleproofs-of-existence
With this, the merkletree_circuit module offers two different circuits:
- `MerkleProofCircuit`: allows to verify both proofs of existence and proofs
non-existence with the same circuit.
- `MerkleProofExistenceCircuit`: allows to verify proofs of existence only.
In this way, if only proofs of existence are needed,
`MerkleProofExistenceCircuit` should be used, which requires less amount
of constraints than `MerkleProofCircuit`.
* Code review
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmad <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* Towards Contains/NotContains in middleware and backend
* Fix build
* Adding error handling to deal with op compile introduce extra ops
* Incorporate Merkle proofs into MockMainPod
* Merkleproof verify circuit (#143)
* merkletree: add keypath circuit
* merkletree-circuit: implement proof of existence verification in-circuit
* parametrize max_depth at the tree circuit
* Constrain selectors in-circuit
* implement merketree nonexistence proof circuit, and add edgecase tests
* add non-existence proofs documentation in the mdbook, mv EMPTY->EMPTY_VALUE & NULL->EMPTY_HASH, dependency clean and public exposure methods
* review comments, some extra polishing and add a test that expects wrong proofs to fail
* Add circuit to check only merkleproofs-of-existence
With this, the merkletree_circuit module offers two different circuits:
- `MerkleProofCircuit`: allows to verify both proofs of existence and proofs
non-existence with the same circuit.
- `MerkleProofExistenceCircuit`: allows to verify proofs of existence only.
In this way, if only proofs of existence are needed,
`MerkleProofExistenceCircuit` should be used, which requires less amount
of constraints than `MerkleProofCircuit`.
* Code review
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmad <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* Towards Contains/NotContains in middleware and backend
* Frontend compound types -- allow one frontend operation to produce multiple middleware statements (in progress)
* Incorporate Merkle proofs into MockMainPod
* Incorporate Merkle proof op arg into frontend
* Compile one statement to many, in progress
* Fix remaining tests
* Minor clean-up
* Oops I did a bunch of work in the middle of a rebase, committing
* Incorporate Merkle proof op arg into frontend
* still working on frontend compound types, refactor compile() to output multiple statements
* Contains statements for frontend types: code compiles
* Tests pass
* Examples use front-end compound types
* Remove old Contains and NotContains from frontend
* Add nin to typos
* Code review
---------
Co-authored-by: arnaucube <git@arnaucube.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahmad <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* Custom statements on backend
* Add support for custom statements and deductions on backend
* typo checker smh
* clean up match statement
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Afuni <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* clean up more match statement
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Afuni <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* delete done todo
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Afuni <root@ahmadafuni.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Afuni <root@ahmadafuni.com>
* Print pods from SignedPodBuilder
* Add additional print to test printing SignedPodBuilder
* Mock-prove and print MainPod
* Implement ToFields for custom predicates and dependencies
* Test: print serialization of a recursive batch
* Rearrange serialization of CustomPredicate so args_len is always in the same position
* Serialize predicates with first entry nonzero to avoid collision with padding
* Off by one error in ethdos test BatchSelf(2)
* cargo fmt
* not a typo
* Typos, trying again
Extend merkletree spec, init SignedPod section, add typos checker in CI
- extend merkletree spec, converting old hand-drawn diagrams to drawio
diagrams, and adding new diagrams (related: #6)
- init SignedPod section (related: #2)
- initial draft of the types dictionary, set, array (related: #26)
- add typos checker in CI (and correct the ones that were detected)
Note on drawio diagrams: each image file contains the metadata to edit the diagram in the draw.io website.
